é

Tag Archives: Advertising

Google’s “Goggles” App Gives Consumers a New Way to Respond

0
dans Leadership & Innovation, News & Trends

If you’re familiar already with QR Codes, a couple of us on the blog have been detailing how this mobile mechanism can be a useful complement to a marketing campaign.  One extremely interesting new tool released by Google this week may give companies (and marketers) something more to think about in terms of how you are using your logos and products.  It’s called Google Goggles, and the easiest way to explain it is to direct you to Google’s own video:

YouTube Preview Image

As you can see, it suggests that any physical thing that can be photographed by a cell phone can now be used as a search term using Google’s image search technology.  This applies to landmarks, bits of text, and more importantly to this discussion – logos and products.  Someone using this app could take a photo of an image on postcard they received, or of a product pictured in a full page print ad, and “goGGle” it.  Or they may take your logo and goggle it.  This was so interesting, I had to test it out on my Android phone.   Here are my results:

A twist on the AOL logo – I took a photo of a full page ad that AOL had on the back of AdAge promoting it’s new advertising system, Project Devil.  The Goggle app didn’t recognize the AOL logo or the word “aol”, possibly because this logo version was so different than the standard AOL logo. It did, however, recognize the text  ”A better web is coming”  which was on the ad, and gave me an option to search that text via google.  I rate this as a #fail, because the first link that appeared when you search that text had nothing to do with AOL.

EA Sports’ videogame “Active 2″ – Next, I took a photo of this ad from today’s Fry’s.com newspaper ad, and the app found this product exactly matching this image.   It presented me with a product search for the “Active 2″ video game on the PS3 system, enabling me to comparison shop on Google Products.  It didn’t recognize the tiny Xbox 360 or Nintendo Wii logos below the image, so would have made me refine my search with the appropriate video game system. From a marketing perspective, however, it was disappointing that no search results appeared relating to purchasing the product on Frys.com – I was presented with a product search first, then the websites for the video game manufacturer…  but never the original retailer (Frys.com).

Corel’s Paintshop Photo Express 2010 – this software brand has been around a long time, so I thought Google would make quick work of finding it. However, when I took a photo of the Fry’s ad containing it, it didn’t recognize the image in the ad (even though I was able to find the exact image on Google’s Image search).  It did recognize the text in the ad, or at least the large font text.  The trouble was that the smaller font was recognized as unintelligible characters (might have been another language) and was appended to the product’s name, making the resulting search useless. A #fail here too.

I shouldn’t be overly harsh on the team working on this product, as this product is only a “beta”, a part of their product experiments that sometimes make it as a full product release, and other times get killed in favor of stronger applications.  They are trying something truly unique with this, that may challenge marketers and brands to re-examine how we are marketing ourselves in print, and force us to do the work necessary to ensure our imagery extends to the web, thus supporting our traditional ad vehicles with images that can be recognized by any mobile phone.

Hopefully there will be a discussion forming as to how brands would have to change the way they create or release ads in order to anticipate consumers’ use of an app like Goggles.  Should all print ads be archived?  Should they be sliced up for easy indexing? How does our SEO change?  What questions spring to mind as you consider Google’s new experiment?

Enhanced by Zemanta

How Many Times Should I Advertise?

2
dans Database Marketing, Marketing Strategy

I’ve been thinking alot about this question, as some who are new to direct marketing have a hard time understanding the time-tested methods that result in positive return on investment.  It might be a generational or technological culture of instant gratification that makes us want to see our first marketing campaign rake in the dough.  It might even be the direct marketing companies that tempt those new to the field with the DMA’s latest ROI metric (and if you haven’t heard it, it’s essentially “For each $1 spent on DM advertising, it results in $10+ of ROI”).  I just feel it needs some more context, to put it in the correct light.

If you send only 1 Ad / Impression, then Give Away the Farm

First off,  most marketing campaigns require more than 1 touch. (If you haven’t heard the term “touch”, touch = impression = ad; but it can also be a phone call or other interaction.)  In fact, marketing campaigns require multiple touches over time to a given customer before they’re ready to buy – just think of any relationship you’ve made in the past – you’re more likely to buy from someone who you’ve had multiple interactions with, than someone you’ve met for the first time (given that choice).  The only exceptions to this marketing rule, are in those cases where a product or service is incredibly cheap or incredibly scarce.  In terms of offers, think $10 round-trip airfare specials  or a seller with an experimental iPhone not available to the public…. you get the picture.

Most of Us Like Balanced Offers

However these extreme types of offers are the exception, not the rule. Most marketing campaigns balance an offer with a description of marketing features/benefits.  Consequently, both your brand (if you have a new/unknown brand) and your specific offer needs time for consumers to recognize the brand, then hone in on your exact message.

Many clients ask – how many times do I send out my mailing / advertisement?  This question is relevant across marketing disciplines, whether you use TV, Radio, Direct Mail or any other outbound method.  I get the sense that most people are looking for a definitive number – an absolute truth in marketing that they can rely on, to do the marketing for them.  It’s good then that people step up to the plate:  some advertising students say 5 impressions is required,   Creative Directors say 8 impressions, and others say 27 times.  I’m glad they step up with these firm numbers, as I am not sure I would ever float a definitive number, because it really depends on all the demographic and psychological factors that go into a specific brand & offer  being marketed to a specific audience.  Even the proponents of the renowned professor John Philip Jones who asserts that in the end, a single ad impression can influence a buyer, have to consider the observable, historical fact, that “enough concentration of media weight” must be placed to that buyer, for it to cross the necessary threshold with her for a purchase decision.  So for many campaigns, this means that one impression won’t cut it.

O.M.G. – Is this going to be a drain on my marketing budget?

Most companies see ROI fairly quickly if they know how to approach their campaign.  Instead of asking “How many times do I send out this ad?”, it might be better to ask “How many minimum touches do I need to send in order to start seeing returns?”  This takes into account all the factors that I mentioned above.  Your ROI trendline will probably look more like a bell curve anyway, so expect that there will be a ramp up period and a period of ongoing positive returns that will make up for the startup cost of branding your impressions on a given audience.  Just make sure you send out your ads for repeated impressions.

Your 5th Ad should not be a Clone of your 1st Ad

I cannot tell you how many times companies take it for granted that they have designed the best possible piece  – and never consider improving it as they go along.  Do research on how to do A/B Testing  (sometimes called Split Testing). The same audience demographic should be getting two different versions of your ad.  Pay close attention which performs better.  Typically you need a large mailing to prove statistically which one wins, but even if you do two small mailings side by side – if you get zero responses from one and 7 from the other, I think you can feel secure to judge a winner.  (Caveat: there may not always be a winner).  The point is that you are increasing the effectiveness of your ad in measurable ways, and by the 6th, 7th, or 8th impression your piece will have matured enough to make the appropriate impact with your prospect.

As a closing thought to the number of times one should advertise – in most cases if your campaign is a direct order campaign, and you can link positive ROI from one of your “Nth” mailings, then watch that ROI percentage closely.   That metric will tell you better than any marketing veteran when to stop advertising.   If you’ve sent out your 20th mailing and there is still positive ROI from the marketing campaign, then ask yourself – is there any reason to stop?

IBM’s First Impression

2
dans Production & Printing

I recently went to a tradeshow where the expo hall was filled with interesting vendors introducing new products and services.  The marketing materials often attract your eye… but it was interesting to see who “skimped” on their marketing and branding.  I took a photo of the materials from the trade show below, try to pick out which flyer/handout most jumps out at you (click for larger image):

Flyers collected at Tradeshow

Flyers collected at Trade show

To me, the one on the most right pops out because of the vibrant use of color and interesting subjects (3 superhero kids).  Second in line is the one on the most left, because I am really into modern art and the postmodern graphic design illustration from the AT&T flyer definitely grabs my attention.

Notably, the least attention-grabbing is IBM’s flyer, which could have been created by a product manager intent on dissemminating the most information possible about their services, instead of a thoughtful marketer.  Why did they think that a black and white flyer printed on copier paper with 1 stock photo inserted would impress anyone?  Just look around – every other vendor uses at least color, if not double sided printing.

IBMs Flyer

IBM's Flyer

I realize that IBM’s in a new world since they sold off their laptop division to Lenovo, but to continue to win business against their rivals they need to re-introduce their brand with a compelling “first impression”.  Using black and white one sided marketing flyers just isn’t going to help you do that.

Insights from Marketing Leaders at the ANA Conference

0
dans News & Trends

The Association of National Advertisers event  ended Nov. 8th in Phoenix, and many marketing veterans had advice to share for those who are struggling with their sales and marketing efforts.  Great thoughts that echo much that we’ve been covering in this blog.  Among the marketers interviewed:

YouTube Preview Image