If you’re familiar already with QR Codes, a couple of us on the blog have been detailing how this mobile mechanism can be a useful complement to a marketing campaign. One extremely interesting new tool released by Google this week may give companies (and marketers) something more to think about in terms of how you are using your logos and products. It’s called Google Goggles, and the easiest way to explain it is to direct you to Google’s own video:
As you can see, it suggests that any physical thing that can be photographed by a cell phone can now be used as a search term using Google’s image search technology. This applies to landmarks, bits of text, and more importantly to this discussion – logos and products. Someone using this app could take a photo of an image on postcard they received, or of a product pictured in a full page print ad, and “goGGle” it. Or they may take your logo and goggle it. This was so interesting, I had to test it out on my Android phone. Here are my results:
A twist on the AOL logo – I took a photo of a full page ad that AOL had on the back of AdAge promoting it’s new advertising system, Project Devil. The Goggle app didn’t recognize the AOL logo or the word “aol”, possibly because this logo version was so different than the standard AOL logo. It did, however, recognize the text ”A better web is coming” which was on the ad, and gave me an option to search that text via google. I rate this as a #fail, because the first link that appeared when you search that text had nothing to do with AOL.
EA Sports’ videogame “Active 2″ – Next, I took a photo of this ad from today’s Fry’s.com newspaper ad, and the app found this product exactly matching this image. It presented me with a product search for the “Active 2″ video game on the PS3 system, enabling me to comparison shop on Google Products. It didn’t recognize the tiny Xbox 360 or Nintendo Wii logos below the image, so would have made me refine my search with the appropriate video game system. From a marketing perspective, however, it was disappointing that no search results appeared relating to purchasing the product on Frys.com – I was presented with a product search first, then the websites for the video game manufacturer… but never the original retailer (Frys.com).
Corel’s Paintshop Photo Express 2010 – this software brand has been around a long time, so I thought Google would make quick work of finding it. However, when I took a photo of the Fry’s ad containing it, it didn’t recognize the image in the ad (even though I was able to find the exact image on Google’s Image search). It did recognize the text in the ad, or at least the large font text. The trouble was that the smaller font was recognized as unintelligible characters (might have been another language) and was appended to the product’s name, making the resulting search useless. A #fail here too.
I shouldn’t be overly harsh on the team working on this product, as this product is only a “beta”, a part of their product experiments that sometimes make it as a full product release, and other times get killed in favor of stronger applications. They are trying something truly unique with this, that may challenge marketers and brands to re-examine how we are marketing ourselves in print, and force us to do the work necessary to ensure our imagery extends to the web, thus supporting our traditional ad vehicles with images that can be recognized by any mobile phone.
Hopefully there will be a discussion forming as to how brands would have to change the way they create or release ads in order to anticipate consumers’ use of an app like Goggles. Should all print ads be archived? Should they be sliced up for easy indexing? How does our SEO change? What questions spring to mind as you consider Google’s new experiment?